​At just a couple of weeks into the 2024-25 school year (depending on where you live), there seems to be positive feedback to newly introduced cell phone bans in Canadian schools. But, are such blanket bans the solution students, parents, teachers, and administrators have been looking for?

​Since late in the 2023-24 school year a number of Canadian provinces have introduced sweeping new cell phone policies, including Nova Scotia (Government of Nova Scotia, 2024; Lau & Bryden-Blom, 2024), Ontario (King's Printer for Ontario, 2024; Rutherford, 2024), and Newfoundland and Labrador (Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, 2024; Head, 2024). These new policies tend to take a tiered approach from blanket bans in lower grades, to permitting personal use during recess and lunch breaks for high school students. Most also include statements similar to that by the Government of Nova Scotia (2024) that there will be "[l]imited exceptions, like junior high and high school teachers allowing cell phone use in class for instructional purposes."

So far, so good? The new policies take an incremental approach to allowing older students greater flexibility to access mobile technologies. The policies also include language that recognizes potential pedagogical affordances and legitimate instructional uses of technology. There is also language around the need to teach children to use technology responsibly. And, so far, anecdotal feedback from both teachers and parents has been positive. Children seem less distracted in the classroom. And more young children are engaging in positive social activity during break times, rather than staring at screens. So, what's the problem?

​At that time, I raised concern that emerging policies were reactionary, and did not examine questions about how mobile technologies were actually being used in schools (including whether any of the schools had integrated targeted pedagogical plans for the use of technology). While there is still a need to ask those questions, this year's round of cell phone bans seems to be a response to a number of issues that go far beyond just time-on-task and test scores. For instance, there is significant and legitimate concern about the potential harms of technology overuse, misuse, and exposure to social media amongst students (Abi-Jaoude et al., 2020; Mayo Clinic, 2024). Fair enough. And, as I've noted, there is some language in the new policies that acknowledges the need to teach digital literacy and digital citizenship skills. But is that actually happening? And how did we get to a point where such sweeping bans are perceived as necessary?

​The introduction of the iPhone in 2007 was a technological and social game-changer (Apple, 2007). As I have noted in the past, smartphone technologies allow us to implement virtually any pedagogical approach that we as educators can dream up (Power, 2015). But, eight years after the launch of the iPhone, I noted in my doctoral dissertation that:

​While there are now many more graduate-level programs that focus on digital pedagogies, teachers still feel overwhelmed by technology (Government Technology, 2023; ISTE, 2023). Lack of time, resources, and support also remain an issue. So, we've had 17 years since the advent of the modern smartphone, and we still haven't prepared teachers or schools for their ubiquity. For over two decades, we've also had well-researched and robust guidelines and resources regarding the critical digital literacies and competencies needed by teachers and students. Examples include the 4Cs developed by the P21 Project (Partnership for 21st Century Learning, 2007), the 7Cs of 21st Century Skills proposed by Trilling and Fadel (2009), and the ISTE Competencies for Educators (2024a) and Students (2024b). Yet, discussing her recent US-based research (Prothero, 2023), Allison Starks described mixed findings about the consistency of teaching key digital literacy skills, especially those related to newer technologies and technology-use issues.

So, the technology has been creeping into schools for over a decade-and-a-half, but teachers still don't feel confident or supported and students are not being adequately trained on key competencies including responsible and ethical use of technology.

​That brings us to another problem that hasn't been resolved in the years since the birth of the smartphone -- the dichotomy between Acceptable Use versus Responsible Use policies. Acceptable Use policies focus on how technology cannot be used. They also tend to take a crime-and-punishment approach. On the other hand, Responsible Use policies focus on how technology should be used. They tend to take a collaborative approach with an emphasis on the development of critical competencies. Despite research and advocacy on the benefits of shifting to Responsible Use policies (Countryman et al., 2016; Murray, 2024; Randles, 2023), most school districts continue to publish and enforce Acceptable Use policies. Newly implemented Canadian school cell phone use policies fall into that category.

So, in addition to failing to prepare ourselves to use technologies that surround us in everyday life, we have also reverted to policy approaches that contradict the research on how policy can support the development of key competencies.

​Long story short -- blanket school cell phone bans put us at risk of burying our heads in the sand to the detriment of preparing students to thrive in broader society.

​The aim of the latest Canadian school cell phone policies seems to be to curb the negative impacts of technology addiction and social media, and to increase classroom engagement and student achievement. But, their implementation may have some nasty unintended -- but foreseeable -- consequences.

​In a general sense, such bans may stifle the freedom of students and teachers to leverage digital tools effectively. Yes, the new policies state that there will be "[l]imited exceptions, like junior high and high school teachers allowing cell phone use in class for instructional purposes" (Government of Nova Scotia, 2024). The key words here are "limited" and "exceptions." Both of these words create barriers for teachers and students, who must justify their use of tools such as cell phones before getting permission to do so. This is antithetical to Soloway and Norris' (Power, 2013) description of technology for mobile learning as tools that are "ready at hand, at the moment you need them." For many teachers, the impact may be that it won't be worth their time to pursue permission to engage in rich learning opportunities, despite the explicit recognition by new policies that legitimate pedagogical uses may be permitted.

The unintended consequences for many students may be far more dire. I'm thinking of students who use technology -- including cell phones -- to increase accessibility in their daily school experiences. While I could (and have!) put together entire books about this (Power, 2024a), I'll provide just a couple of examples here. 

​Outside of regular classroom activities, three of the aims of prohibiting primary, elementary, and middle school children from using their cell phones during break times are to encourage decreased exposure to social media, to increase "healthy" social interaction, and to decrease incidents of cyberbullying. I have heard of recent social media comments to the effect that "no child that age should bury their faces in a screen for recess and lunch." In reference to a child with a severe anxiety disorder resulting from chemical-neurological issues, who also has significant mobility issues caused by a degenerative neuromuscular disorder, another social media comment implied that "it wouldn't hurt him to try to socialize more." Without getting into medical specifics, the ability to use their cell phone for personal use at recess and lunch has been a critical lifeline for this specific student, whose anxiety disorder and mobility issues all but preclude "normal, healthy social interaction" on the school playground. Comments such as those noted above are ableist and imply that the student simply needs to try harder to make their disabilities disappear. Again, were this student still in middle school they may well be able to get an exception to the rule allowing them to use their phone at recess and lunch. But, they would still be faced with the unreasonable burden of constant justification (an impossibility due to the severe selective mutism accompanying their anxiety disorder). And they would still be faced with the unreasonable burden ​of being singled out as different from their peers. The question is, why should they have to face this?

​17 years after the introduction of the first smartphones, we find ourselves in a position where we have not heeded the warning signs of significant issues until they came to a head. We have not adequately adapted teacher preparation to a point where teachers feel comfortable with this technology. It appears that we have not done enough to prepare our students to responsibly and ethically use this technology, and to recognize the interactions between technology and the world-at-large. And, we continue to implement policies in counterintuitive formats. Today, we are faced with a new technological emergence in the form of Artificial Intelligence applications. Their use in schools and in society is growing at unprecedented rates (DeLaire, 2023; OpenAI, n.d.; Power, 2024d; Shankland, 2024). The slow pace of adapting -- or rather reacting -- to change we've seen since the launch of the iPhone simply won't cut it this time. We need to be proactive about preparing teachers, developing Responsible Use policies, and imparting the digital literacy and citizenship skills needed by our students in the age of AI. We also need to do better when it comes to inadvertently erecting new barriers for some of our most vulnerable students.

​The latest round of Canadian school cell phone policy updates appears to be well-intentioned. Parents, teachers, administrators, and policy-makers are reacting to a clear need to do something to increase classroom engagement and to protect the mental health of students. But, returning to my original lamentation drawn from my 2018 blog post (Power, 2018):

​These are questions that we need to consider, such as:

Abi-Jaoude, E., Treurnicht Nayor, K., & Pignatiello, A. (2020). Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 192(6), E136-E141. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012622/

Apple (2007, January 30). Apple Reinvents the Phone with the iPhone. https://www.apple.com/ca/newsroom/2007/01/09Apple-Reinvents-the-Phone-with-iPhone/

Cerullo, M. (2024, September 10). Apple's new AirPods Pro dpouble as a hearing aid. Experts call it a game changer. CBC News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apples-new-airpods-pro-double-hearing-aid/

Countryman, J., Vardakas, M., & Taffe, M. (2016). Acceptable use policies. http://educ5101jmm.pbworks.com/w/page/104432989/PBL%201%20-%20Group%204%20-%20Acceptable%20Use%20Policies 

DeLaire, M. (2023, August 31). More than half of Canadian students over 18 use AI tools: survey. CTV News. https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/more-than-half-of-canadian-students-over-18-use-ai-tools-survey-1.6543380

Excalibur Publications (2016, January 21). New Academic Accommodations Adopted by York’s CDS (Full interview with Navi Dhanota). [Video]. https://youtu.be/pBHp5NBSaH0

Ferguson, E. (2024, May 2). Alberta Education asks parents about cellphone use in schools. Calgary Herald. https://calgaryherald.com/news/politics/alberta-education-ontario-cellphone-ban-schools-parents-opinion

Flanagan, R. (2018, May 30). PC platform includes ban on cellphones in schools. CTV News Kitchener. https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/pc-platform-includes-ban-on-cellphones-in-classrooms-1.3952316#_gus&_gucid=&_gup=twitter&_gsc=Qi5DSUU

Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (2024, August 20). Provincial Government Reminding Families About Use of Personal Electronic Devices in Schools. https://www.gov.nl.ca/releases/2024/education/0820n02/#:~:text=Families%20in%20K%2D6%20schools,Acceptable%20Use%20of%20Technology%20Policy.

Government of Nova Scotia (2024, June 6). New Cell Phone Directive for Nova Scotia Schools. https://news.novascotia.ca/en/2024/06/06/new-cell-phone-directive-nova-scotia-schools

Government Technology (2023, September 25). ISTE: Most New K-12 Teachers Not Confident About Technology. https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/iste-most-new-k-12-teachers-not-confident-about-technology

​Head, J. (2024, August 29). N.L. government mulling cellphone ban in middle school, high school classrooms. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/cell-phone-regulations-1.7307372

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2023). Transforming Teacher Education. [Report]. https://info.iste.org/epp-white-paper

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2024a). ISTE Standards: For Educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2024b). ISTE Standards: For Students. https://iste.org/standards/students

Kenny, R.F., Park, C.L., Van Neste-Kenny, J.M.C., & Burton, P.A. (2010). Mobile self-efficacy in Canadian nursing education programs. In M. Montebello, V. Camilleri and A. Dingli (Eds.), Proceedings of mLearn 2010, the 9th World Conference on Mobile Learning, Valletta, Malta.

King's Printer for Ontario (2024, August 28). Ontario Cracking Down on Cellphone Use and Banning Vaping in Schools. https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1004501/ontario-cracking-down-on-cellphone-use-and-banning-vaping-in-schools

Lau, R. & Bryden-Blom, S. (2024, August 31). Back to school: Optimism abounds as new cellphone rules set to begin in N.S. classrooms. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/10726794/nova-scotia-school-cellphone-policies/

Maharaj, S. (September 9, 2024). For successful school phone bans, administrators and parents need to support teachers. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/for-successful-school-phone-bans-school-administrators-and-parents-need-to-support-teachers-238142

Mayo Clinic (2024, January 18). Teens and social media use: What's the impact? https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/tween-and-teen-health/in-depth/teens-and-social-media-use/art-20474437

Murray, T. (2024, June 1). Acceptable or Responsible? What's Your Use Policy? [Web log post]. Thomas C. Murray. https://www.thomascmurray.com/blog/usepolicy

Ontario Human Rights Commission (2016, January 6). New documentation guidelines for accommodating students with mental health disabilities. [Web page]. https://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/news_centre/new-documentation-guidelines-accommodating-students-mental-health-disabilities

OpenAI (n.d.). ChatGPT [Software application]. https://chat.openai.com

Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2007). Framework for 21st Century Learning. [PDF file]. https://www.battelleforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/P21_framework_0816_2pgs.pdf 

Power, R. (2013, November 7). Soloway and Norris Mobile Litmus Test. [Video]. https://youtu.be/FPP2VKIP5xI

Power, R. (2015). A framework for promoting teacher self-efficacy with mobile reusable learning objects (Doctoral dissertation, Athabasca University). http://hdl.handle.net/10791/63

Power, R. (2016, March 2). Ban First, Ask Questions Later… The Problem with Calls to Ban Mobile Devices. [Web log post]. xPat_Letters. https://robpower74.blogspot.com/2016/03/ban-first-ask-questions-later-problem.html

Power, R. (2018, June 11). Still Banning First, Asking Questions Later... [Web log post]. Power Learning Solutions. https://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/blog/still-banning-first-asking-questions-later

Power, R. (2024a). The ALT Text: Accessible Learning with Technology. Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/thealttext/

​Power, R. (2024b). An Overview of Selected Tools to Support Accessibility. The ALT Text: Accessible Learning with Technology. Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/thealttext/chapter/an-overview-of-selected-tools-to-support-accessibility/

Power, R. (2024c). Barriers to Accessibility. The ALT Text: Accessible Learning with Technology. Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/thealttext/chapter/barriers-to-accessibility/

Power, R. (2024d). Evaluating Graduate Education Students’ Self-Efficacy with the Use of Artificial Intelligence Agents. Journal of Educational Informatics, 5(1), 3-19. https://journalofeducationalinformatics.ca/index.php/JEI/article/view/269

​Randles, J. (2023, January 4). 5 Tips for Creating a District Responsible Use Policy. [Web log post]. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). https://iste.org/blog/5-tips-for-creating-a-district-responsible-use-policy

​Rutherford, K. (2024, July 9). Ontario's policy on student cellphone use starts this fall. Should this northern board dial restrictions up? CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/cellphones-classroom-student-restrictions-social-1.7257561

Shankland, S. (2024, January 10). OpenAI's GPT Store Now Offers a Selection of 3 Million Custom AI Bots. CNET. https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/openais-gpt-store-now-offers-a-selection-of-3-million-custom-ai-bots/

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.

I've been playing around a bit with using HP Reveal Studio (formerly Aurasma Studio) to created Augmented Reality resources, such as interactive game boards and conference posters. For Mobile Summit 2018 and the 17th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn 2018), I developed a workshop on how to use HP Reveal Studio to create an AR treasARmap. That's a magic treasure map that appears blank for my students, until they scan it using the HP Reveal (formerly Aurasma) app using their mobile devices. What they see when they scan the blank map is something like the image below, where the pieces of the map slowly reveal themselves.

The QR code and URL on the image above will take you to the companion resources that I created for the workshops. But, since I've had a lot of requests for this, I've put together this blog post to bring everything together into one spot, and show how I created the AR treasARmap.

The treasARmap map was created using the Canva free online poster and infographic creation suite. It was then "augmented" using a free HP Reveal Studio account. This is what the final product looks like:

Accessing the Hidden Treasure Map

To access this augmented reality "treasARmap," install the HP Reveal (formerly Aurasma) AR app on your mobile device. Launch the app, point your device at the image below, and click on the AR objects to follow a team's path to the finish line!

Get the App

Follow Rob Power, EdD on HP Reveal

• Launch the HP Reveal app
• Click on the "search" (magnifying glass) icon
• Search for Rob Power, EdD 

Do It Yourself

• Find or create a background pattern for your treasARmap poster.
• Create an account at Canva (if you don't already have one).
• Upload your poster background into Canva.
• Use Canva to create the static text and images (the non-Augmented Reality components that will always be visible) on your treasARmap.
• Save your treasARmap in Canva.
• ​Export a copy of your treasARmap poster as an image file (.png or .jpg).

Additional Useful Tutorials

Do It Yourself

• Login to HP Reveal Studio (or create an account, if you do not have one yet).
• Create a new "Aura" by uploading the treasARmap poster background that you created in Canva.
• Add 3-4 "layer" images to your treasARmap "aura."
• Try adding the following actions to your "layer" images:
  • Have one layer trigger a YouTube video.
  • Have one layer link to a Google Form.
  • Have all but one of your layers "hidden" when your treasARmap is first scanned.
  • Add a delayed "trigger" to one of your layers, so that it appears at a set time after another layer.
  • Add a "trigger" to one layer, so that when it is clicked, one or more of your other layers appear.
  • Create a "branching trigger," where two layer images are visible, and the map changes (with different additional layers appearing) based on the trigger layer selected by the user.
• Save your completed treasARmap.
• Preview your completed treasARmap, and download the "target image." Give it an appropriate filename!
• Open the image you downloaded, and test it using the HP Reveal app!

Additional Useful Tutorials

I'd love to see what you come up with playing around with the concept of creating AR treasARmaps, or other AR resources for your teaching and learning! I've set up the following Padlet wall as a spot where participants in the treasARhunt workshops can share their completed projects... but feel free to post yours, as well. (Just be sure to include a note as to "who" we need to follow using the HP Reveal app to bring your treasARmap to life!)

I seem to have occasion to repost my most viewed blog post to date once every few months, as the discussions around blanket bans on mobile devices in schools rear their ugly heads once again. This time, it's talk from the newly elected Progressive Conservative government in Ontario, Canada, who are placing a blanket ban on mobiles on the table as part of their incoming platform (Flanagan, 2018). (A few months back, it was the blanket ban on cell phones in schools in France (Willsher, 2017).) So... here it is again... reposted here so that this March 2016 post from my old blog site, the xPat_Letters Blog, has a new home (and new context) here on the brand new Power Learning Blog.

Ban First, Ask Questions Later... The Problem with Calls to Ban Mobile Devices (updated)
(originally posted March 2, 2016)

I read the article Schools that Ban Mobile Devices See Better Results on the bus this morning. It is from May 2015, but someone had reposted the @guardian piece to my @Twitter feed. From my perspective as a mobile learning researcher, it presented troubling research findings:

But, they’re not troubling for the obvious reason presented in the story. The premise of the story (and the research on which it was based) was that mobile devices are distracting students to the level of significant lost instructional time. And if schools want to see better test scores, then they had better start banning mobile devices. No. This is not the problem.

A blanket ban on mobile devices because they distract learners is just the latest in a centuries-old trend of resisting technological change out of fear of the unknown. Steve Howard (2012, July 14) pointed out that as far back as 1815 a school principal fought against the introduction of paper and ink, and lamented that:

What IS troubling with this story (and research) are the questions that were NOT asked. The research shows an increase in achievement across ALL schools that have banned mobile devices versus ALL schools that allow them. BUT, no attempt is made to look at schools that actually plan for mobile technology integration. It could be that the majority of the schools polled have no such plans, in which case the argument that mobile devices only serve to distract students is likely true. But what of schools that have coordinated their technological infrastructure and pedagogical strategies to leverage mobile devices within the curriculum?

I have predicated my mobile learning research to date on the problem that teachers and schools are the barriers to effective integration of mobile technologies because they lack confidence in the technology. The problem is NOT that mobile devices are allowed into schools. The problem is that we are not preparing teachers and schools for an environment of ubiquitous access to technology. From my dissertation (Power, 2015, p. 11):

Technology will never replace good teachers. But technology can make good teachers better. Better teacher (and school) preparation will enable educators to make instructional design decisions that incorporate technology, and increase student engagement and access to learning opportunities and resources. My research has shown that professional development focused on scaffolding technology integration in the context of desired learning outcomes and appropriate pedagogical decisions does increase teachers’ interest and confidence in using educational technology. If teachers are interested, and plan how they will leverage technology in the classroom, then distraction will decrease and learning will improve.

However, preparing teachers to leverage educational technology is not enough. We must also prepare students. Yes, if you let students who have had no guidance access mobile devices, then there is huge potential for them to be distracted. But, if you teach them digital citizenship and responsible use, there is less likelihood of distraction. And they will be better prepared for a world with near universal technology permeation. You cannot teach digital citizenship or responsible technology use with black and white policies of either banning all devices, or letting them all in. Unfortunately, the information technology support departments (and bureaucracies) of too many school systems (and higher education institutions) still operate with Acceptable Use Policies, which explicitly detail what is permissible and what is not. In contrast, Responsible Use Policies focus on making appropriate decisions about when and how to use technology. (Joe Countryman, Mary-Ann Vardakas & Melissa Taffe did a presentation on this, and prepared a wikipage about it for a Problem-Based Learning activity in the Digital Tools for Knowledge Construction course I teach at University of Ontario Institute of Technology.)

Before policy makers, or the public at large, jump to the conclusion that the statistics presented in the Guardian (and also on CNN) point to the need for an outright ban on mobile devices in education, a number of questions should be considered:

1. How do students perform at schools that have planned for mobile technology integration?
2. How do students perform in classes where teachers have been prepared to make effective educational technology integration choices?
3. What factors are creating barriers to effectively leveraging mobile technologies in the schools polled in this research? And what can be done to overcome those barriers?

I do not think that the key to improving learning in schools is to ban access to technology, as the Guardian story would lead readers to conclude. Rather, I see the issues raised by this story (and research) as lending support to the need for more research and funding to support planned approaches to educational technology integration. To solve these problems, and the issues raised in the Guardian story, we need to:

• Better prepare teachers to integrate technology in teaching and learning practice
• Teach digital literacy and digital citizenship
• Adopt Responsible Use policies