​At just a couple of weeks into the 2024-25 school year (depending on where you live), there seems to be positive feedback to newly introduced cell phone bans in Canadian schools. But, are such blanket bans the solution students, parents, teachers, and administrators have been looking for?

​Since late in the 2023-24 school year a number of Canadian provinces have introduced sweeping new cell phone policies, including Nova Scotia (Government of Nova Scotia, 2024; Lau & Bryden-Blom, 2024), Ontario (King's Printer for Ontario, 2024; Rutherford, 2024), and Newfoundland and Labrador (Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, 2024; Head, 2024). These new policies tend to take a tiered approach from blanket bans in lower grades, to permitting personal use during recess and lunch breaks for high school students. Most also include statements similar to that by the Government of Nova Scotia (2024) that there will be "[l]imited exceptions, like junior high and high school teachers allowing cell phone use in class for instructional purposes."

So far, so good? The new policies take an incremental approach to allowing older students greater flexibility to access mobile technologies. The policies also include language that recognizes potential pedagogical affordances and legitimate instructional uses of technology. There is also language around the need to teach children to use technology responsibly. And, so far, anecdotal feedback from both teachers and parents has been positive. Children seem less distracted in the classroom. And more young children are engaging in positive social activity during break times, rather than staring at screens. So, what's the problem?

​At that time, I raised concern that emerging policies were reactionary, and did not examine questions about how mobile technologies were actually being used in schools (including whether any of the schools had integrated targeted pedagogical plans for the use of technology). While there is still a need to ask those questions, this year's round of cell phone bans seems to be a response to a number of issues that go far beyond just time-on-task and test scores. For instance, there is significant and legitimate concern about the potential harms of technology overuse, misuse, and exposure to social media amongst students (Abi-Jaoude et al., 2020; Mayo Clinic, 2024). Fair enough. And, as I've noted, there is some language in the new policies that acknowledges the need to teach digital literacy and digital citizenship skills. But is that actually happening? And how did we get to a point where such sweeping bans are perceived as necessary?

​The introduction of the iPhone in 2007 was a technological and social game-changer (Apple, 2007). As I have noted in the past, smartphone technologies allow us to implement virtually any pedagogical approach that we as educators can dream up (Power, 2015). But, eight years after the launch of the iPhone, I noted in my doctoral dissertation that:

​While there are now many more graduate-level programs that focus on digital pedagogies, teachers still feel overwhelmed by technology (Government Technology, 2023; ISTE, 2023). Lack of time, resources, and support also remain an issue. So, we've had 17 years since the advent of the modern smartphone, and we still haven't prepared teachers or schools for their ubiquity. For over two decades, we've also had well-researched and robust guidelines and resources regarding the critical digital literacies and competencies needed by teachers and students. Examples include the 4Cs developed by the P21 Project (Partnership for 21st Century Learning, 2007), the 7Cs of 21st Century Skills proposed by Trilling and Fadel (2009), and the ISTE Competencies for Educators (2024a) and Students (2024b). Yet, discussing her recent US-based research (Prothero, 2023), Allison Starks described mixed findings about the consistency of teaching key digital literacy skills, especially those related to newer technologies and technology-use issues.

So, the technology has been creeping into schools for over a decade-and-a-half, but teachers still don't feel confident or supported and students are not being adequately trained on key competencies including responsible and ethical use of technology.

​That brings us to another problem that hasn't been resolved in the years since the birth of the smartphone -- the dichotomy between Acceptable Use versus Responsible Use policies. Acceptable Use policies focus on how technology cannot be used. They also tend to take a crime-and-punishment approach. On the other hand, Responsible Use policies focus on how technology should be used. They tend to take a collaborative approach with an emphasis on the development of critical competencies. Despite research and advocacy on the benefits of shifting to Responsible Use policies (Countryman et al., 2016; Murray, 2024; Randles, 2023), most school districts continue to publish and enforce Acceptable Use policies. Newly implemented Canadian school cell phone use policies fall into that category.

So, in addition to failing to prepare ourselves to use technologies that surround us in everyday life, we have also reverted to policy approaches that contradict the research on how policy can support the development of key competencies.

​Long story short -- blanket school cell phone bans put us at risk of burying our heads in the sand to the detriment of preparing students to thrive in broader society.

​The aim of the latest Canadian school cell phone policies seems to be to curb the negative impacts of technology addiction and social media, and to increase classroom engagement and student achievement. But, their implementation may have some nasty unintended -- but foreseeable -- consequences.

​In a general sense, such bans may stifle the freedom of students and teachers to leverage digital tools effectively. Yes, the new policies state that there will be "[l]imited exceptions, like junior high and high school teachers allowing cell phone use in class for instructional purposes" (Government of Nova Scotia, 2024). The key words here are "limited" and "exceptions." Both of these words create barriers for teachers and students, who must justify their use of tools such as cell phones before getting permission to do so. This is antithetical to Soloway and Norris' (Power, 2013) description of technology for mobile learning as tools that are "ready at hand, at the moment you need them." For many teachers, the impact may be that it won't be worth their time to pursue permission to engage in rich learning opportunities, despite the explicit recognition by new policies that legitimate pedagogical uses may be permitted.

The unintended consequences for many students may be far more dire. I'm thinking of students who use technology -- including cell phones -- to increase accessibility in their daily school experiences. While I could (and have!) put together entire books about this (Power, 2024a), I'll provide just a couple of examples here. 

​Outside of regular classroom activities, three of the aims of prohibiting primary, elementary, and middle school children from using their cell phones during break times are to encourage decreased exposure to social media, to increase "healthy" social interaction, and to decrease incidents of cyberbullying. I have heard of recent social media comments to the effect that "no child that age should bury their faces in a screen for recess and lunch." In reference to a child with a severe anxiety disorder resulting from chemical-neurological issues, who also has significant mobility issues caused by a degenerative neuromuscular disorder, another social media comment implied that "it wouldn't hurt him to try to socialize more." Without getting into medical specifics, the ability to use their cell phone for personal use at recess and lunch has been a critical lifeline for this specific student, whose anxiety disorder and mobility issues all but preclude "normal, healthy social interaction" on the school playground. Comments such as those noted above are ableist and imply that the student simply needs to try harder to make their disabilities disappear. Again, were this student still in middle school they may well be able to get an exception to the rule allowing them to use their phone at recess and lunch. But, they would still be faced with the unreasonable burden of constant justification (an impossibility due to the severe selective mutism accompanying their anxiety disorder). And they would still be faced with the unreasonable burden ​of being singled out as different from their peers. The question is, why should they have to face this?

​17 years after the introduction of the first smartphones, we find ourselves in a position where we have not heeded the warning signs of significant issues until they came to a head. We have not adequately adapted teacher preparation to a point where teachers feel comfortable with this technology. It appears that we have not done enough to prepare our students to responsibly and ethically use this technology, and to recognize the interactions between technology and the world-at-large. And, we continue to implement policies in counterintuitive formats. Today, we are faced with a new technological emergence in the form of Artificial Intelligence applications. Their use in schools and in society is growing at unprecedented rates (DeLaire, 2023; OpenAI, n.d.; Power, 2024d; Shankland, 2024). The slow pace of adapting -- or rather reacting -- to change we've seen since the launch of the iPhone simply won't cut it this time. We need to be proactive about preparing teachers, developing Responsible Use policies, and imparting the digital literacy and citizenship skills needed by our students in the age of AI. We also need to do better when it comes to inadvertently erecting new barriers for some of our most vulnerable students.

​The latest round of Canadian school cell phone policy updates appears to be well-intentioned. Parents, teachers, administrators, and policy-makers are reacting to a clear need to do something to increase classroom engagement and to protect the mental health of students. But, returning to my original lamentation drawn from my 2018 blog post (Power, 2018):

​These are questions that we need to consider, such as:

Abi-Jaoude, E., Treurnicht Nayor, K., & Pignatiello, A. (2020). Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 192(6), E136-E141. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012622/

Apple (2007, January 30). Apple Reinvents the Phone with the iPhone. https://www.apple.com/ca/newsroom/2007/01/09Apple-Reinvents-the-Phone-with-iPhone/

Cerullo, M. (2024, September 10). Apple's new AirPods Pro dpouble as a hearing aid. Experts call it a game changer. CBC News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apples-new-airpods-pro-double-hearing-aid/

Countryman, J., Vardakas, M., & Taffe, M. (2016). Acceptable use policies. http://educ5101jmm.pbworks.com/w/page/104432989/PBL%201%20-%20Group%204%20-%20Acceptable%20Use%20Policies 

DeLaire, M. (2023, August 31). More than half of Canadian students over 18 use AI tools: survey. CTV News. https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/more-than-half-of-canadian-students-over-18-use-ai-tools-survey-1.6543380

Excalibur Publications (2016, January 21). New Academic Accommodations Adopted by York’s CDS (Full interview with Navi Dhanota). [Video]. https://youtu.be/pBHp5NBSaH0

Ferguson, E. (2024, May 2). Alberta Education asks parents about cellphone use in schools. Calgary Herald. https://calgaryherald.com/news/politics/alberta-education-ontario-cellphone-ban-schools-parents-opinion

Flanagan, R. (2018, May 30). PC platform includes ban on cellphones in schools. CTV News Kitchener. https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/pc-platform-includes-ban-on-cellphones-in-classrooms-1.3952316#_gus&_gucid=&_gup=twitter&_gsc=Qi5DSUU

Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (2024, August 20). Provincial Government Reminding Families About Use of Personal Electronic Devices in Schools. https://www.gov.nl.ca/releases/2024/education/0820n02/#:~:text=Families%20in%20K%2D6%20schools,Acceptable%20Use%20of%20Technology%20Policy.

Government of Nova Scotia (2024, June 6). New Cell Phone Directive for Nova Scotia Schools. https://news.novascotia.ca/en/2024/06/06/new-cell-phone-directive-nova-scotia-schools

Government Technology (2023, September 25). ISTE: Most New K-12 Teachers Not Confident About Technology. https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/iste-most-new-k-12-teachers-not-confident-about-technology

​Head, J. (2024, August 29). N.L. government mulling cellphone ban in middle school, high school classrooms. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/cell-phone-regulations-1.7307372

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2023). Transforming Teacher Education. [Report]. https://info.iste.org/epp-white-paper

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2024a). ISTE Standards: For Educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2024b). ISTE Standards: For Students. https://iste.org/standards/students

Kenny, R.F., Park, C.L., Van Neste-Kenny, J.M.C., & Burton, P.A. (2010). Mobile self-efficacy in Canadian nursing education programs. In M. Montebello, V. Camilleri and A. Dingli (Eds.), Proceedings of mLearn 2010, the 9th World Conference on Mobile Learning, Valletta, Malta.

King's Printer for Ontario (2024, August 28). Ontario Cracking Down on Cellphone Use and Banning Vaping in Schools. https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1004501/ontario-cracking-down-on-cellphone-use-and-banning-vaping-in-schools

Lau, R. & Bryden-Blom, S. (2024, August 31). Back to school: Optimism abounds as new cellphone rules set to begin in N.S. classrooms. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/10726794/nova-scotia-school-cellphone-policies/

Maharaj, S. (September 9, 2024). For successful school phone bans, administrators and parents need to support teachers. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/for-successful-school-phone-bans-school-administrators-and-parents-need-to-support-teachers-238142

Mayo Clinic (2024, January 18). Teens and social media use: What's the impact? https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/tween-and-teen-health/in-depth/teens-and-social-media-use/art-20474437

Murray, T. (2024, June 1). Acceptable or Responsible? What's Your Use Policy? [Web log post]. Thomas C. Murray. https://www.thomascmurray.com/blog/usepolicy

Ontario Human Rights Commission (2016, January 6). New documentation guidelines for accommodating students with mental health disabilities. [Web page]. https://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/news_centre/new-documentation-guidelines-accommodating-students-mental-health-disabilities

OpenAI (n.d.). ChatGPT [Software application]. https://chat.openai.com

Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2007). Framework for 21st Century Learning. [PDF file]. https://www.battelleforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/P21_framework_0816_2pgs.pdf 

Power, R. (2013, November 7). Soloway and Norris Mobile Litmus Test. [Video]. https://youtu.be/FPP2VKIP5xI

Power, R. (2015). A framework for promoting teacher self-efficacy with mobile reusable learning objects (Doctoral dissertation, Athabasca University). http://hdl.handle.net/10791/63

Power, R. (2016, March 2). Ban First, Ask Questions Later… The Problem with Calls to Ban Mobile Devices. [Web log post]. xPat_Letters. https://robpower74.blogspot.com/2016/03/ban-first-ask-questions-later-problem.html

Power, R. (2018, June 11). Still Banning First, Asking Questions Later... [Web log post]. Power Learning Solutions. https://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/blog/still-banning-first-asking-questions-later

Power, R. (2024a). The ALT Text: Accessible Learning with Technology. Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/thealttext/

​Power, R. (2024b). An Overview of Selected Tools to Support Accessibility. The ALT Text: Accessible Learning with Technology. Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/thealttext/chapter/an-overview-of-selected-tools-to-support-accessibility/

Power, R. (2024c). Barriers to Accessibility. The ALT Text: Accessible Learning with Technology. Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/thealttext/chapter/barriers-to-accessibility/

Power, R. (2024d). Evaluating Graduate Education Students’ Self-Efficacy with the Use of Artificial Intelligence Agents. Journal of Educational Informatics, 5(1), 3-19. https://journalofeducationalinformatics.ca/index.php/JEI/article/view/269

​Randles, J. (2023, January 4). 5 Tips for Creating a District Responsible Use Policy. [Web log post]. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). https://iste.org/blog/5-tips-for-creating-a-district-responsible-use-policy

​Rutherford, K. (2024, July 9). Ontario's policy on student cellphone use starts this fall. Should this northern board dial restrictions up? CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/cellphones-classroom-student-restrictions-social-1.7257561

Shankland, S. (2024, January 10). OpenAI's GPT Store Now Offers a Selection of 3 Million Custom AI Bots. CNET. https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/openais-gpt-store-now-offers-a-selection-of-3-million-custom-ai-bots/

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.

​One of my instructional design students recently raised a good question about the use of color to emphasize text in digital documents (one that warrants a bit of a "mea culpa" on my part!). In the first weeks of the term, I advised students to avoid highlighting text or using colored fonts for emphasis. Then, in a recent response to another student's discussion forum questions, I highlighted her questions to set them apart from my responses. The recent question was along the lines of "you told us never to highlight text because it is a digital accessibility violation, but you just highlighted text in your post... can you clarify?"

So... my "mea culpa." ​My initial advice came across as a "hard and fast" rule -- NEVER use color for emphasis. The truth is, it is a bit more like the "i before e" rule of English spelling than an absolute. There are plenty of exceptions to the "i before e" rule in the English language. And, there are plenty of nuances to the "rules" around using color for emphasis of text in instructional design. In my early course advice, I didn't get into these nuances because we'll be exploring digital accessibility basics for instructional design in more detail later in the course (as students are building ID pilot projects). The original student had highlighted some key points in a discussion post for emphasis, and another student had configured all of their discussion posts to use a purple font. So, I brought up the topic of the use of color for emphasis a bit early, to get my students thinking about how to avoid creating unnecessary barriers for their reading audiences (kind of like how primary school teachers emphasize the "i before e" rule in the early grades, and let students learn the exceptions and nuances of English spelling later on). 

​The truth is, you CAN use colored text or highlighted text for emphasis. BUT, it ONLY works for "sight" readers who have no visual acuity issues. Such techniques will cause issues if:

​So... you CAN use color for emphasis. BUT, you must carefully consider the potential unintended consequences for your audience! The best strategy is to avoid using colored text or highlighted text unless absolutely necessary. That will avoid all of the issues noted above. Another strategy is to include some additional form of emphasis to grab the attention of "audio" readers, such as adding a graphical icon with appropriate ALT text like the following:

In the example above, the "alert" icon creates additional emphasis for "sighted" readers. It also contains the ALT text "This is an important point!," which will be read aloud to "audio" readers who are using screen reader applications.

​Finally, you should always "test" your product before sharing it. You can use a color contrast analyzer tool like the free Colour Contrast Analyzer available from TPGI (2024). When testing color contrast ratios (the perceptive differences between the foreground (text) and background (page or screen) colors), be sure to also test the ratios when displaying the content in grey scale, and when displaying the content on a dark mode screen. Here's how that would look using a sample of the text like what I shared (using yellow highlighted text, and some text with a purple font) via our course discussion forum:

Let's take a look at the results of color contrast tests on each text display version to see where we run into potential accessibility issues.

As you can see, the yellow highlighted text that I used in my discussion forum post is still readable, and passes all levels of WCAG standards for digital accessibility (World Wide Web Consortium, 2023). But, how about when that text is viewed in grey scale or on a "dark mode" screen?

Now, let's take a look at the text formatted with a purple font.

The color contrast test results show that using a purple font can be problematic for your readers in just about any screen display mode.

Sometimes it is necessary to use color to emphasize things when creating digital teaching and learning resources (or any digital text resources). For instance, differentiating between items based on their color may be a functional technical requirement (such as with colored buttons), or one of your required content learning outcomes (such as differently colored safety labels). In those cases, you can use the following strategies:

The key is to ensure that any emphasis you intend to create by using color is not lost for any readers who cannot actually perceive that color, or who will have difficulty viewing the text because of the color choice!

OpenDyslexis (n.d.). OpenDyslexic: A typeface for Dyslexia. https://opendyslexic.org/

Power, R. (2020, February 13). Helping Everyone Access Your Online Teaching Resources. [Web log post]. Power Learning Solutions. https://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/blog/helping-everyone-access-your-online-learning-resources

Power, R. (2023, April 6). A Picture Isn't Always Worth a Thousand Words... [Web log post]. Power Learning Solutions. https://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/blog/a-picture-isnt-always-worth-a-thousand-words

Power, R. (2023). Chapter 17. Accessibility in Online Learning. Everyday Instructional Design: A Practical Resource for Educators and Instructional Designers. Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/everydayid/chapter/accessibility-in-online-learning/

TPGI (2024). Colour Contrast Analyzer (CCA). https://www.tpgi.com/color-contrast-checker/

World Wide Web Consortium (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/

​Sometimes we share videos with our students that are not narrated, and that contain just on-screen text. While viewers can technically read the text embedded in the video, this method does not truly meet Digital Accessibility requirements. That's because the use of embedded text in a video is the same as embedding text within an image in a document. It is not machine-readable, and thus it excludes audience members who may need to use a screen reader application for any reason (they may be visually-impaired, have low language reading ability, have a reading-related learning disability such as Dyslexia, or they may be a non-native language speaker who needs to translate your text for better comprehension). 

The two best ways to help all potential viewers get the most out of your non-narrated video content are to:

• Make sure you have Closed Captions enabled, using the on-screen text for the captions text.
• Provide a transcript file for your video.

​YouTube Creators (2021) has an excellent overview of how to add or edit captions either when you are uploading your video, or after your video has already been published. Remember, for a video with no narration (just text on screen), you will need to transcribe that text into the captions editor (either manually, or copy-paste the "slide" text from your video, and insert it to align with the timings when it appears on screen.

​Another option for creating subtitles or captions for a non-narrated video is to use an external video editing application, like Screencast-O-Matic (2019). This option works well if you have a copy of the video file (MP4 or other format) on your computer, but is less useful if you use a tool like PowToon (2022) to create your video and export it directly to YouTube (because you cannot download the video file unless you have a pro-level subscription).

​While the following webinar demonstration video (Power, 2021, April 9) features the creation of captions for a narrated video using Screencast-O-Matic, the steps for creating, editing, and uploading your captions file to YouTube would be the same for a text-only video.

​In addition to making sure your text-only video has Closed Captions enabled, I also strongly recommend adding a transcript file for your visually-impaired users. A transcript file can be opened or downloaded. Your audience members can then use any screen reader application (such as JAWS (Freedom Scientific, n.d.), NVDA (NV Access, 2023), or Google Read and Write (Texthelp, 2023)) to read the on-screen video text out load to them. The following video shows how I uploaded a transcript file to Google Drive, and then added a link to that transcript to the video description for my instructor welcome video in YouTube. Remember to make sure your transcript file meets basic document accessibility requirements before sharing it! For more on that topic, refer to my blog post Helping Everyone Access Your Online Learning Resources (Power, 2020).

Freedom Scientific. (n.d.). JAWS. [computer software]. https://www.freedomscientific.com/  

NV Access (2023). About NVDA. [computer software]. https://www.nvaccess.org/about-nvda/

Power, R. (2019, November 9). Hi There! Meet Rob Power. [video]. https://youtu.be/ff-6GtdX9xM

Power, R. (2020, February 13). Helping Everyone Access Your Online Learning Resources. [Web log post]. Power Learning Solutions. https://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/blog/helping-everyone-access-your-online-learning-resources

Power, R. (2021, April 9). Creating Your Own Video Captions (Webinar Demonstration). [video]. https://youtu.be/4ghNMjCDOfg

Power, R. (2023, May 1). Adding Transcripts to YouTube Videos. [video]. https://youtu.be/q5z_ZHCVFjg

PowToon (2022). https://www.powtoon.com/

Screencast-O-Matic (2019). Video Creation for Everyone. [Web page]. https://screencast-o-matic.com/

Texthelp (2023). Read&Write for Google Chrome. [computer software]. https://www.texthelp.com/products/read-and-write-education/for-google-chrome/
​
YouTube Creators (2021, May 5). How to Add Captions While Uploading & Editing Your Videos. [video]. https://youtu.be/rB9ql0L0cU

​There are lots of cases where the graphics we use contain text. Sometimes it is unavoidable. The questions you should be asking in this case are:

​The following graphic illustrates a common example of graphics that I see in my email inbox where actual text should be used instead of the image:

​There is nothing in this graphic that could not be put in regular text format, and a screen reader cannot "see" the text in the image to read it out to you. Sure, you could repeat the text within the ALT tag for the image, so that a screen reader will read it out... but what's the point? The graphic does not actually clarify or add anything to the message, and you are wasting time creating the graphic and typing the text into the ALT tag when you could simply type it right onto the page! Additionally, text within your image will NOT reflow and resize based on the reader's screen size and orientation, which could also render that text unreadable to your entire audience. You are also preventing anyone who uses an Accessibility plugin from modifying the font, color, or contrast of the text to make it more readable in their specific context. And, besides the message potentially being lost for anyone using a screen reader (if they do engage with the content at all), there is the potential that your intended audience may also view the message as SPAM, and thus ignore it!

​Here is a better example of a graphic that could be used to accompany the same message. In this case, you can see that the image is being used to draw visual readers' attention to some key points. The accompanying ALT text tells a screen reader user why the image is being used. And the main points of the message are included in regular text format in the body of the page.

​If you are going to use a graphic as part of your message or content page, make sure you test that image in "dark mode." Most of the time, we are not working in dark mode when we create graphics. If our graphics have transparent backgrounds, they will display differently for any reader who has adjusted the color scheme of their screen. Parts of the graphic may end up getting "washed out" by a different color screen background, rendering them unreadable. Here is an example of an email message that contains a graphic with a transparent background, as viewed in dark mode on my mobile device. The message was unreadable until I got to my desktop computer!

​The quick fix to this is to remove the transparent background before publishing the graphic, and choose a background color that has a sufficient color contrast ratio with the foreground (text).

​I recently ran into an issue during a Microsoft Teams meeting, and did some digging afterwards to troubleshoot. The problem was that I could not hear any sound through my wireless headset during the meeting, while using a custom audio configuration that had previously worked flawlessly (a Logitech USB webcam, Blue Snowball external microphone, and a SkullCandy Hesh 2 Bluetooth headset). 

I played around with my system, and determined that this issue does not impact other online meeting platforms such as Zoom, Google Meet, or Skype – just Teams.

As many post-secondary institutions prepare to return to in-person classes following the switch to remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic, we're all wondering how we can effectively return to classroom teaching with social distancing practices in place. If there's one thing that we've learned from the shift to online teaching and learning, it's that there are a number of digital tools that we can use to share resources and maximize student engagement during virtual classes. Well, the good news is that many of those tools and approaches can also be leveraged in the classroom. 

In preparation for a return to in-person classes at Cape Breton University, my colleagues and I took some time to visit one of our campus' large lecture theatres to record some demonstrations of how we can leverage digital tools, including Microsoft Teams, to engage with our students safely and effectively. The following are a series of videos that I edited from that demonstration session. In these videos, we cover how to:

• Start up Teams to share resources during an in-person class
• Start sharing a presentation and use in-class polls using PowerPoint and Poll Everywhere
• Use Poll Everywhere to administer an open-response poll
• Use videos and Padlet
• Use Kahoot!
• Collaborate with Breakout Groups
• Help students navigate to Teams resources
• Get students to present resources using Teams

Resources Referenced in Demonstrations

• Kahoot! (instructor portal)
• Kahoot.it (student portal)
• Padlet
• Poll Everywhere

Microsoft Teams
Access the complete video library of Microsoft Teams Tips and Tricks for Educators at https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJ8QfsveW2Zp0ksxQAoBMqZkRvTyF1pa

Moodle
Access the complete library of Moodle Tips and Tricks for Educators at https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJ8QfsveW2Zbm4pm-W6rtdI_vj4gnDMM

​I recently had a question which reminded me... I should never assume that everyone already knows how to use YouTube! I like YouTube as a EdTech tool, because it is a powerful way to share video content with your students (why bother worrying about how to process and stream video content, when YouTube already has powerful servers that will do it for you!). And that doesn't mean that you have to direct them to YouTube to view it. You can embed your YouTube videos directly into a website, or an LMS content page.

To that end, here are a few resources that might be helpful. This first video shows the basics of how to upload and share videos in YouTube. As noted in the video... you do need to login. All you need for that is a GMail / Google account!

​This next video goes over some of the basics of choosing a privacy setting for your video. It's important to choose the right setting. If you want your video to be available publicly, then choose "Public." If you want to share your video with your students, and embed it into a webpage or LMS page, choose "Unlisted." "Unlisted" means the video can't be found using a search engine, but anyone with the link can still view it without a password. If you don't want anyone to view it without you directly allowing "just that person" to see it, choose "Private." Even with a direct URL, no one will be able to watch the video unless you authorize their email address!

​Finally... here are some quick tutorial videos showing the basics of how to embed a YouTube video (whether it's one you uploaded, or another video that you found on YouTube) into pages in some of the LMS platforms that I have worked with most frequently:

​One of the great things about embedding a YouTube video into a webpage or course page in an LMS is that you won't be violating the video owner's copyright (assuming the person who posted the video isn't violating a copyright within the video itself!). That's because you're not actually making a copy of the video. You're essentially just sharing a link to it, and if the owner decides they don't want anyone to use it anymore, they can remove the video, or change the privacy setting. When they do that, your embedded player simply won't show it any more!

​YouTube has a few different "licencing" options when you post your own videos. The default is "Standard YouTube Licence," which is essentially a copyright licence. I prefer to change that setting to a Creative Commons Attribution. Using a CC Attribution means that you are letting others reuse your video as an Open Access resource, so long as they properly attribute you. It also means that you are allowing others to make a copy, edit, remix, or combine parts of your video with other Creative Commons videos from YouTube!

If you have a Google or GMail account, then you already have a YouTube account. In this video, I demonstrate the basic steps to setting up your own YouTube channel for sharing instructional videos with your students.

By default, new YouTube accounts have a time limit of 15 minutes for each video upload. To increase this, you will need to "verify" your account with Google. Instructions on how to do this can be found HERE.

Eves, D. (2014, January 2). How to Properly Upload Videos to YouTube. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/Hlxqk0iHp5w

Gniffke, D. (2016, May 11). Canvas - Embedding Video. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/l2ebbdJPy0o

Google (2020). Upload videos longer than 15 minutes. [Web page]. YouTube Help. Available from https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/71673?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en&oco=0

Interesting Videos (2017, February 2). Creative Commons License YouTube cc Not Standard Youtube License. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/e-46x3mpS8M

Power, R. (2015, January 25). Embedding Videos in D2L. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/QZ4558qvzhw

Power, R. (2020, April 17). Creating a YouTube Channel for Educators. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/Uy_5gOV80LY

Scott Gardiner Technical Services (2016, May 2). How to Embed a YouTube Video on Your Weebly Website. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/4PfKoV9XyN0

Straub, S. (2018, February 17). How To Embed Media Such As Youtube Videos Into Blackboard. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/BWIF_d2Vcc4

Tattershall, E. (2017, June 6). Embedding Video in Your Moodle Course. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/K4zAZuHGNrM

thebasicgist (2013, June 6). Youtube Settings: Unlisted v Private v Public. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/fViYcDDZyhk

University of Leicester Learning and Teaching (2016, February 29). Embed a YouTube video in Blackboard. [YouTube video]. Available from https://youtu.be/ES-CZtBdHOI

I've been playing around a bit with using HP Reveal Studio (formerly Aurasma Studio) to created Augmented Reality resources, such as interactive game boards and conference posters. For Mobile Summit 2018 and the 17th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn 2018), I developed a workshop on how to use HP Reveal Studio to create an AR treasARmap. That's a magic treasure map that appears blank for my students, until they scan it using the HP Reveal (formerly Aurasma) app using their mobile devices. What they see when they scan the blank map is something like the image below, where the pieces of the map slowly reveal themselves.

The QR code and URL on the image above will take you to the companion resources that I created for the workshops. But, since I've had a lot of requests for this, I've put together this blog post to bring everything together into one spot, and show how I created the AR treasARmap.

The treasARmap map was created using the Canva free online poster and infographic creation suite. It was then "augmented" using a free HP Reveal Studio account. This is what the final product looks like:

Accessing the Hidden Treasure Map

To access this augmented reality "treasARmap," install the HP Reveal (formerly Aurasma) AR app on your mobile device. Launch the app, point your device at the image below, and click on the AR objects to follow a team's path to the finish line!

Get the App

Follow Rob Power, EdD on HP Reveal

• Launch the HP Reveal app
• Click on the "search" (magnifying glass) icon
• Search for Rob Power, EdD 

Do It Yourself

• Find or create a background pattern for your treasARmap poster.
• Create an account at Canva (if you don't already have one).
• Upload your poster background into Canva.
• Use Canva to create the static text and images (the non-Augmented Reality components that will always be visible) on your treasARmap.
• Save your treasARmap in Canva.
• ​Export a copy of your treasARmap poster as an image file (.png or .jpg).

Additional Useful Tutorials

Do It Yourself

• Login to HP Reveal Studio (or create an account, if you do not have one yet).
• Create a new "Aura" by uploading the treasARmap poster background that you created in Canva.
• Add 3-4 "layer" images to your treasARmap "aura."
• Try adding the following actions to your "layer" images:
  • Have one layer trigger a YouTube video.
  • Have one layer link to a Google Form.
  • Have all but one of your layers "hidden" when your treasARmap is first scanned.
  • Add a delayed "trigger" to one of your layers, so that it appears at a set time after another layer.
  • Add a "trigger" to one layer, so that when it is clicked, one or more of your other layers appear.
  • Create a "branching trigger," where two layer images are visible, and the map changes (with different additional layers appearing) based on the trigger layer selected by the user.
• Save your completed treasARmap.
• Preview your completed treasARmap, and download the "target image." Give it an appropriate filename!
• Open the image you downloaded, and test it using the HP Reveal app!

Additional Useful Tutorials

I'd love to see what you come up with playing around with the concept of creating AR treasARmaps, or other AR resources for your teaching and learning! I've set up the following Padlet wall as a spot where participants in the treasARhunt workshops can share their completed projects... but feel free to post yours, as well. (Just be sure to include a note as to "who" we need to follow using the HP Reveal app to bring your treasARmap to life!)

​The benefits and drawbacks of the integration of technology into both the curriculum, and teaching and learning practice, continue to be contentious issues on multiple fronts.  On the one hand, there are those who continue to subscribe to Clark’s (1994 a, b) contention that technology has no impact whatsoever on learning achievement. Evidence may point to this conclusion that technology integration results in no significant difference in learning achievement compared to “traditional” classroom settings. However, there are many more reasons why it is imperative that teachers and schools thoughtfully plan for meaningful technology integration. Clark’s long-time rival in the media effectiveness debate, Kozma (1994 a, b), points to the fact that newer technologies enable pedagogical approaches and learning experiences that previously were not possible (and for which there can be no technology-free learning achievement comparison). These learning opportunities include the ability for remote learners, and those facing accessibility challenges, to be engaged on unprecedented levels. Another imperative for meaningful technology integration is the preparation of learners to be responsible digital citizens, who are empowered to leverage technology to meet emerging needs in their lives, learning, work, and society.

Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018 has been written by participants in EDUC 5303G, a course in the Masters of Education program at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology. The mandate of EDUC 5303G is to 

EDUC 5303G aims to live up to its own mandate, and meaningfully integrate technology into the course curriculum, and overall learning experience. Digital communications tools, such as the Pressbooks platform, allow for a transformation of the traditional academic paper writing experience. Rather than writing a paper to demonstrate topic understanding, and competence with writing mechanics, for just an instructor’s review, technology enables course participants to write with purpose.

This eBook chapter writing endeavour allows participants in a course like EDUC 5303G to more fully engage with their peers in the writing process, in a manner that reflects the realities of academic writing beyond the classroom. The project also allows them to share their work with a global audience. This integration of technology forces students to take deeper ownership of their work, but also allows them to share the fruits of their labours with others who could benefit from their explorations of topics related to the meaningful use of technology in education.
​
It gives me great pleasure to facilitate access to the tools and processes used by provide the EDUC 5303G Spring/Summer 2018 participants to produce the eBook, and to share the resources they have compiled.

Clark, R.E. (1994a). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), pp. 21-30.

Clark, R.E. (1994b). Media and method. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 7-10.

Kozma, R. (1994a). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), pp. 7 - 19.

Kozma, R. (1994b). A reply: Media and methods. (1994). Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), pp. 11 - 14.

Power, R. (Ed). (2018). Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018. [eBook]. Surrey, BC, Canada: Power Learning Solutions. Available from ​​https://techandcurriculum.pressbooks.com/

​What are the challenges that we face as technology integration specialists in our teaching and learning contexts? And, what tips or advice do you have for overcoming some of those hurdles? Those are questions that I just posed to graduate education students participating in my Spring/Summer 2018 section of EDUC5303G: Technology and the Curriculum.

From my experience (and from my chapter in Yu, Ally and Tsanikos (2018) and my keynote presentation at Mobile Summit 2018)... One of the biggest hurdles that we seem to face is getting past shifting into the "Early Adopters" or very early "Early Majority" phases of the Diffusion of Innovation model (Rogers, 1974):

​If we look at the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989), I don't think that the problem with intention (and action) to integrate technology lies with "Perceptions of Usefulness." We see examples every day of how useful different technologies can be.

​Digital technologies can do just about anything that we can dream up for them to do... and examples of innovative EdTech use abound. It's easy to find them, and it's easy to share them. (That doesn't mean we should slack off on our efforts in this area... ideas and inspiration are still of vital importance.)

So... if the problem is not with "Perceptions of Usefulness" in TAM, it must be with "Perceived Ease of Use." It's pretty reasonable to understand the causes of this problem. Ally and Tsinakos (2014) lament that our teacher preparation programs are largely still preparing teachers to function in a system that hasn't really existed since the 1980s. Finger, Jamieson-Proctor and Albion have similarly lamented that changes in digital technologies that could benefit the curriculum:

​The biggest problem we face in getting teachers to integrate technology into their practice isn't that they don't see it as useful... it's that they don't feel comfortable using it. They lack a strong perception of self-efficacy. As Tschannen-Moran and Woolfolk Hoy (2001) note:

​If we can help teachers to feel more comfortable with using technology, and they already see that technology as being potentially useful, they'll be more likely to experiment with it in their teaching and learning practice.

So... how do we get there?

​In my Handbook chapter, and Mobile Summit 2018 Keynote, I focused in on how widespread TPACK (Koehler & Mishra, 2006, 2008; TPACK.org, 2012) has become in guiding teacher professional development when it comes to technology integration. As teachers, we already have strengths in the areas of Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Knowledge. It's easy for us to demonstrate the usefulness of different technologies, and to find training or resources on the technical how-to of technologies that we do choose to integrate (assuming that we can find the time to pursue them!). So we've got those aspects of TPACK covered off pretty well. And, if we're using TPACK to help shape professional development based on our needs as teachers, then we don't need to focus so much on addressing those areas. But, what TPACK shows us we're still missing, and fails in-and-of-itself to deliver, is the actual Technical-Pedagogical Knowledge area. Without this understanding of pedagogical decision-making for the use of technology, how are teachers going to increase their confidence in their ability to use technology effectively?

​As I've already noted, teachers are pedagogical professionals. If we want to increase their self-efficacy when it comes to meaningfully and effectively integrating technology into their practice, we don't need to focus on either the usefulness of the technology, or how to use specific tech tools or "apps du-jour." What we need to focus on is how to make pedagogical decisions first, decide when tools are needed, and then find appropriate tools to "get the job done." 

In my research, I've demonstrated exactly what Tschannen-Moran and Woolfolk Hoy (2001) were talking about. When provided with tools to support pedagogical decisions around the use of technology, teachers became both more interested in, and more willing to experiment with technologies they hadn't used before. In my research, I focused on the use of mobile learning strategies, and I provided teachers with professional development that focused on making instructional design decisions using an evidence-driven framework. They did get to the "fun" bit of playing with the tech itself (I mean, how boring would PD be if we never got a chance to play with the toys!) -- but I carefully minimized the cognitive load of learning new technologies, so that the teachers could focus on the technology integration decisions that they were making.

​What's the point of my rant in this blog post? While we should keep up with experimenting with innovative technology use in education, our main concern should not be with either what the technology can possibly do, or how to use that technology. The focus should be on how to use the technology meaningfully. To get there, we need to place sufficient focus in teacher preparation programs and professional development efforts on how to make decisions about when it's appropriate to use technology tools, and how to frame our instructional design decisions. If teachers feel confident as to why they are using tools, and in the fact that it's not so important that they be experts with all of the tools themselves (after all -- our students can oftentimes provide us with on-the-spot tech support!), then their self-efficacy will go up. That will get more teachers to the "Intention to Use" stage in TAM, which will bring us closer to the Late Majority stage in the Diffusiion of Innovation model.

You can find my full slidedeck from my Mobile Summit 2018 keynote presentation HERE. You can learn more about my research into the CSAM framework HERE, and the mTSES tool that I used to measure changes in teachers' perceptions of self-efficacy with mobile learning HERE.

Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. (2014). Increasing access through mobile learning. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Athabasca University Press and the Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/resources/publications/Pages/detail.aspx?PID=466 

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008

Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., Albion, P. (2010). Beyond pedagogical content knowledge: The importance of TPACK for informing preservice teacher education in Australia. In M. Turcanyis-Szabo & N. Reynolds (Eds.), Key competencies in the knowledge society (pp. 114-125). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 109(6), 1017-1054. Retrieved from http://punya.educ.msu.edu/publications/journal_articles/mishra-koehler-tcr2006.pdf

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education and Routledge, NY, New York.

Power, R. (2018). The CSAM framework. [Web page]. Power Learning Solutions. Available from http://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/csam.html

Power, R. (2018, May 16). Making mobile learning work for educators and students. Opening keynote address at Mobile Summit 2018, 16-17 May 2018, Scarborough, ON, Canada. Available from http://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/making-mobile-learning-work.html 

Power, R. (2018). The Mobile Teacher's Sense of Efficacy Scale (mTSES). [Web page]. Power Learning Solutions. Available from http://www.powerlearningsolutions.com/mtses.html

Power, R. (2018). Supporting mobile instructional design with CSAM. In S. Yu, M. Ally, & A. Tsanikos (Eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning: An international handbook, pp. 193-209. Singapore: Springer Nature. DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-6144-8_12. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6144-8_12

Rogers, E. (1974). New product adoption and diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 290–301. 

tpack.org (2012). The TPACK image. Retrieved from http://www.tpck.org/

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.